1. “Consumers’ knowledge and beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters HASTRUP et al. 10 (1) 84 Tobacco Control”. 1970 04 14. Retrieved 2013 01 02.
  2. “The History of Filters”. Retrieved 2008 05 18.
  3. “British American Tobacco Cigarettes”. Retrieved 2013 01 02.
  4. “What are cigarettes and filters made of? Longwood University”. Retrieved 2013 01 02.
  5. “Cigarette Filter Danger”
  6. 1966 Lark cigarette commercial
  7. Rigotti NA, Tindle HA (March 2004). “The fallacy of “light” cigarettes”. BMJ 328 (7440) E278 9. doi 10.1136/bmj.328.7440.E278. PMC 2901853. PMID 15016715.
  8. Louis R. Carlozo (June 18, 2008). “Kicking butts How the butts stack up”. Chicago Tribune. “10 15 years length of time it takes a filter’s component fibers to break down they do not biodegrade”
  9. /
  10. a b
  11. Ceredigion County Council dead link
  12. Register KM (August 2000). “Cigarette Butts as Litter Toxic as Well as Ugly”. Underwater Naturalist, Bulletin of the American Littoral Society 25 (2).
  13. Pauly JL, Mepani AB, Lesses JD, Cummings KM, Streck RJ (March 2002). “Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years what Philip Morris never told smokers”. Tob Control 11 (Suppl 1) I51 61. doi 10.1136/ PMC 1766058. PMID 11893815. “Table 1 Chronology of events related to the marketing of cigarettes filters in the USA, and filter fibre and carbon particle “fall out” assays of Phillip Morris, Inc”
  14. International Coastal Cleanup 2006 Report, page 8 dead link

Books v. cigarettes – wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Victory electronic cigarettes’ vapestick(r) brand launches in russia – wsj.com

Orwell states that the essay was triggered by the experience of an editor friend who was firewatching during the Second World War. He was told by factory workers that they had no interest in literature because they could not afford books.

The essay first appeared in Tribune on February 8, 1946.

Argument edit

Orwell questions the idea that buying or reading a book is an expensive hobby. Working out that he had 442 books in his flat and an equivalent number elsewhere, he allocates a range of prices, depending on whether the books were bought new, given, provided for review purposes, borrowed or loaned. Averaging the cost over his lifetime, and adding other incidental reading costs, he estimates his annual expenditure at 25.

In contrast, Orwell works out that before the war he was spending 20 a year on beer and tobacco and that he currently spends 40 per year on tobacco. He works out the national average spent on beer and tobacco to be 40 a year. Noting that it is difficult to establish a relationship between the price of different types of books and the value derived from them, Orwell works out that if books are read simply recreationally, the cost per hour is less than the cost of a cinema seat. Therefore, reading is one of the cheapest recreations.

Excerpts edit

And if our book consumption remains as low as it has been, at least let us admit that it is because reading is a less exciting pastime than going to the dogs, the pictures or the pub, and not because books, whether bought or borrowed, are too expensive.

Reactions edit

Orwell’s essays in Tribune, including this, have been described in The Independent as some of the greatest essays in the English language. 1 The question Orwell raised continues to provide a basis for discussion, as in a review of a poll in which one in four Americans read no books at all in 2007 2 and that chief executives claim that they have no time to read literature. 3

The essay was the subject of an update by Structo Magazine who published “Books v. Cigarettes 63 years on”.

See also edit

  • Aliteracy
  • Bibliography of George Orwell

References edit